Blogroll

Jumat, 09 Maret 2012

Index Persepsi Korupsi 2003


Corruption Perceptions Index 2003
The CPI 2003 Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people, academics and risk analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt). A total of 15 surveys were used from nine independent institutions, and at least three surveys were required for a country to be included in the CPI.
Go to: National IQ differences - likely causes
Go to: Other success factors for nations and individuals


CPI


Countries - listed in order from least to most corrupt in 2003, as perceived by others
Corruption Perception Index 2003 from:
http://www.transparency.org/
cpi/2003/cpi2003.en.html		 GDP/ capita 2002 with Purchasing Power Parity from:
http://www.worldfactsandfigures.com/
gdp_country_desc.php		 Average IQ in the nation from:
http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/
article_intelligence/t4.htm 		Degree of Development
Finland
9.7
26,200
97
 Developed
Iceland
9.6
25,000
98
 Developed
New Zealand
9.5
20,200
100
 Developed
Denmark
9.5
29,000
98
 Developed
Singapore
9.4
24,000
100
 Developed
Sweden
9.3
25,700
101
 Developed
Netherlands
8.9
26,900
102
 Developed
Australia
8.8
27,000
98
 Developed
Switzerland
8.8
31,700
101
 Developed
Norway
8.8
31,800
98
 Developed
United Kingdom
8.7
25,700
100
 Developed
Canada
8.7
29,400
97
 Developed
Luxembourg
8.7
44,000
101
 Developed
Hong Kong
8.0
26,000
107
 Developed
Austria
8.0
27,700
102
 Developed
Germany
7.7
26,600
102
 Developed
Belgium
7.6
29,000
100
 Developed
Ireland
7.5
30,500
93
 Developed
United States
7.5
37,600
98
 Developed
Chile
7.4
10,000
93
 Developed
Israel
7.0
19,000
94
 Developed
Japan
7.0
28,000
105
 Developed
Spain
6.9
20,700
99
 Developed
France
6.9
25700
98
 Developed
Portugal
6.6
18,000
95
 Developed
Oman
6.3
8,200
83
 Developing
Bahrain
6.1
14,000
83
 Developed
Cyprus
6.1
15,000
92
 Developed
Botswana
5.7
9,500
72
 Developing
Taiwan
5.7
18,000
104
 Developed
Qatar
5.6
21,500
78
 Developed
Uruguay
5.5
7,600
96
 Developing
Estonia
5.5
10,900
97
 Developed
Kuwait
5.3
15,000
83
 Developed
Italy
5.3
25,000
102
 Developed
Malaysia
5.2
9,300
92
 Developing
United Arab Emirates
5.2
22,000
83
 Developed
Tunisia
4.9
6,500
84
 Developing
Hungary
4.8
13,300
99
 Developed
Namibia
4.7
6,900
72
 Developing
Lithuania
4.7
8,400
97
 Developing
Cuba
4.6
2,300
85
 Underdeveloped
Jordan
4.6
4,300
87
 Developing
Trinidad and Tobago
4.6
9,500
80
 Developing
Belize
4.5
4,900
83
 Developing
Saudi Arabia
4.5
10,500
83
 Developed
South Africa
4.4
10,000
72
 Developed
Mauritius
4.4
11,000
81
 Developed
Costa Rica
4.3
8,500
91
 Developing
Greece
4.3
19,000
92
 Developed
Korea, South
4.3
19,400
106
 Developed
Belarus
4.2
8,000
96
 Developing
Bulgaria
3.9
6,600
93
 Developing
Brazil
3.9
7,600
87
 Developing
Czech Republic
3.9
15,300
97
 Developed
Jamaica
3.8
3,900
72
 Developing
Latvia
3.8
8,300
97
 Developing
El Salvador
3.7
4,700
84
 Developing
Peru
3.7
4,800
90
 Developing
Colombia
3.7
6,500
88
 Developing
Croatia
3.7
8,800
90
 Developing
Slovakia
3.7
12,200
96
 Developed
Mexico
3.6
9,000
87
 Developing
Poland
3.6
9,500
99
 Developing
Syria
3.4
3,500
87
 Underdeveloped
Sri Lanka
3.4
3,700
81
 Underdeveloped
China
3.4
4,400
100
 Developing
Panama
3.4
6,000
84
 Developing
Ghana
3.3
2,100
71
 Underdeveloped
Egypt
3.3
3,900
83
 Developing
Morocco
3.3
3,900
85
 Developing
Dominican Republic
3.3
6,100
84
 Developing
Thailand
3.3
6,900
91
 Developing
Senegal
3.2
1,500
64
 Underdeveloped
Turkey
3.1
6,900
90
 Developing
Mali
3.0
860
68
 Underdeveloped
Armenia
3.0
3,800
93
 Developing
Lebanon
3.0
5,400
86
 Developing
Iran
3.0
7,000
84
 Developing
Malawi
2.8
670
71
 Underdeveloped
India
2.8
2,540
81
 Underdeveloped
Romania
2.8
7,000
94
 Developing
Mozambique
2.7
1,000
72
 Underdeveloped
Russia
2.7
9,300
96
 Developing
Madagascar
2.6
760
79
 Underdeveloped
Yemen
2.6
840
83
 Underdeveloped
Nicaragua
2.6
2,500
84
 Underdeveloped
Algeria
2.6
5,300
84
 Developing
Tanzania
2.5
630
72
 Underdeveloped
Ethiopia
2.5
750
63
 Underdeveloped
Zambia
2.5
890
77
 Underdeveloped
Gambia
2.5
1,800
64
 Underdeveloped
Pakistan
2.5
2,000
81
 Underdeveloped
Philippines
2.5
4,200
86
 Developing
Albania
2.5
4,500
90
 Developing
Argentina
2.5
10,200
96
 Developed
Vietnam
2.4
2,250
96
 Underdeveloped
Uzbekistan
2.4
2,500
87
 Underdeveloped
Moldova
2.4
2,500
95
 Underdeveloped
Guatemala
2.4
3,700
79
 Underdeveloped
Venezuela
2.4
5,500
88
 Developing
Kazakhstan
2.4
6,300
93
 Developing
Sudan
2.3
1,420
72
 Underdeveloped
Zimbabwe
2.3
2,400
66
 Underdeveloped
Bolivia
2.3
2,500
85
 Underdeveloped
Honduras
2.3
2,600
84
 Underdeveloped
Ukraine
2.3
4,500
96
 Developing
Macedonia
2.3
5,000
93
 Developing
Sierra Leone
2.2
550
64
 Underdeveloped
Uganda
2.2
1,260
73
 Underdeveloped
Iraq
2.2
2,400
87
 Underdeveloped
Ecuador
2.2
3,100
80
 Underdeveloped
Cote d'Ivoire
2.1
1,500
71
 Underdeveloped
Papua New Guinea
2.1
2,300
84
 Underdeveloped
Kyrgyzstan
2.1
2,800
87
 Underdeveloped
Libya
2.1
7,400
84
 Developing
Kenya
1.9
1,020
72
 Underdeveloped
Indonesia
1.9
2,900
89
 Underdeveloped
Tajikistan
1.8
1,250
87
 Underdeveloped
Angola
1.8
1,600
69
 Underdeveloped
Cameroon
1.8
1,700
70
 Underdeveloped
Georgia
1.8
3,100
93
 Underdeveloped
Azerbaijan
1.8
3,500
87
 Underdeveloped
Myanmar
1.6
1,660
86
 Underdeveloped
Paraguay
1.6
4,200
85
 Developing
Haiti
1.5
1,700
72
 Underdeveloped
Nigeria
1.4
875
67
 Underdeveloped
Bangladesh
1.3
1,700
81
 Underdeveloped
Albania
?
4500
90
 Underdeveloped
Palestine: Gaza
West Bank
?
?
600
800
87 (Jordan)
87 (Jordan)
 Underdeveloped
Underdeveloped
The last three areas have very high corruption. They are noteworthy because the corruption and income of their neighboring countries is significantly different. These differences fuel the ongoing despair and violence in these regions.
This chart and correlations on this page were done by Parhatsathid (Ted) Napatalung of Thailand. Questions on this page should be sent to Ted at parhat@yahoo.com . Click for Ted's basic analysis of the causes of corruption or details of how corruption hurts Nigeria. Or click to read his comments on what the numbers on this page mean. Low corruption (high 1st column scores above) shows a very high 0.89 correlation to income, while the correlation of IQ to income is a bit lower at 0.67.
For another interesting contribution by Professor Ted to this website, see The Apprentice TV show and SQ skills
Developed Countries Correlation Coefficients
If integrity is already high, improvement in integrity takes an even greater importance.

IQ to GDP Corrupt to GDP IQ to Corrupt
GDP
0.5847804
0.723046008
0.557679697
Log GDP
0.5888812
0.709619697




Developing Countries Correlation Coefficients
If integrity is medium, IQ takes equal importance to integrity.

IQ to GDP Corrupt to GDP IQ to Corrupt
GDP
0.6096047
0.574192128
0.206513484
Log GDP
0.6863854
0.612479943




Underdeveloped Countries Correlation Coefficients
If integrity is low, IQ takes a great importance towards GDP.

IQ to GDP Corrupt to GDP IQ to Corrupt
GDP
0.6031906
0.232614825
0.149918456
Log GDP
0.6901287
0.167734259




Also on this topic: Corruption, Income Distribution, and Growth from http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v12y2000i2p155-182.html This paper uses an encompassing framework developed by Murphy et al. (1991, 1993) to study corruption and how it affects income distribution and growth. We find that (1) corruption affects income distribution in an inverted U-shaped way, (2) corruption alone also explains a large proportion of the Gini differential across developing and industrial countries, and (3) after correcting for measurement errors, corruption seems to retard economic growth. But the effect is far less pronounced than the one found in Mauro (1995). Moreover, corruption alone explains little of the continental growth differentials. In countries where the asset distribution is less equal, corruption is associated with a smaller increase in income inequality and a larger drop in growth rates.
Go to: Nation rankings on business competitiveness
Go to: Happiness of various nations
Diposting oleh di

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Langganan: Posting Komentar (Atom)